-
04-24
WOWO Rights Protection Case Agented by the Lawyers of Our Firm Finally Succeeded after Two Years
The case that the trademark of Szechwan WOWO Chain Supermarket Management Co., Ltd. (WOWO Company) is similar to Thai flag which was agented by the senior partner of our firm, Yingmei Han, and the full-time lawyer, Yun Zhang (Beijing Office), has finally been judged by Beijing Municipal High Court after review, first instance and second instance over nearly two years of effort that WOWO won the lawsuit, and WOWO trademark was maintained. When being interviewed by West China City Daily, the lawyer, Yun Zhang, stated that when judging whether the trademark is similar to the flag in the writing judgment, the Court should not only consider the constituent elements of trademark and its integral degree of approximation, but also consider the significance and popularity of relevant trademarks and the association degree of applied commodity, and it should consider whether confusion may be caused easily as the judgment standard.
-
04-24
WOWO Rights Protection Case Agented by the Lawyers of Our Firm Finally Succeeded after Two Years
The case that the trademark of Szechwan WOWO Chain Supermarket Management Co., Ltd. (WOWO Company) is similar to Thai flag which was agented by the senior partner of our firm, Yingmei Han, and the full-time lawyer, Yun Zhang (Beijing Office), has finally been judged by Beijing Municipal High Court after review, first instance and second instance over nearly two years of effort that WOWO won the lawsuit, and WOWO trademark was maintained. When being interviewed by West China City Daily, the lawyer, Yun Zhang, stated that when judging whether the trademark is similar to the flag in the writing judgment, the Court should not only consider the constituent elements of trademark and its integral degree of approximation, but also consider the significance and popularity of relevant trademarks and the association degree of applied commodity, and it should consider whether confusion may be caused easily as the judgment standard.
-
04-24
WOWO Rights Protection Case Agented by the Lawyers of Our Firm Finally Succeeded after Two Years
The case that the trademark of Szechwan WOWO Chain Supermarket Management Co., Ltd. (WOWO Company) is similar to Thai flag which was agented by the senior partner of our firm, Yingmei Han, and the full-time lawyer, Yun Zhang (Beijing Office), has finally been judged by Beijing Municipal High Court after review, first instance and second instance over nearly two years of effort that WOWO won the lawsuit, and WOWO trademark was maintained. When being interviewed by West China City Daily, the lawyer, Yun Zhang, stated that when judging whether the trademark is similar to the flag in the writing judgment, the Court should not only consider the constituent elements of trademark and its integral degree of approximation, but also consider the significance and popularity of relevant trademarks and the association degree of applied commodity, and it should consider whether confusion may be caused easily as the judgment standard.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.
-
04-04
Intellectual Property Centre of Tahota Undertook Trademark Infringement Lawsuit and Won Compensation of 800,000 yuan
Recently, the lawsuit about Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd's accusing Xinjiang Renhe Spring Department Store Co., Ltd of trademark infringement and unfair competition undertaken by the intellectual property centre of our firm was settled down through second trial as final judgment. The higher people's court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region announced a verdict of affirmation of first instance judgment, i.e. , the defendant should call off an infringement immediately, change the business' name, compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of eight hundred thousand yuan and extend a formal apology.